Level of Acceptance of a Plant-Based Product
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56487/zf2cve06Keywords:
Vegetable products — Plant proteins — Plant-based diet — Food analysisAbstract
Introduction. The adoption of a vegetarian diet has become increasingly relevant due to the growing environmental and public health challenges. This highlights the importance of promoting plant-based products that are free from animal-derived ingredients. Plant-based products that provide all essential amino acids are critical for various biological functions and may offer long-term health benefits. However, certain plant-based alternatives may be high in calories and low in essential nutrients. Consumer acceptance of such products is largely influenced by sensory attributes such as taste, appearance, and texture. Methodology. This study employed a non-experimental, cross-sectional design to assess the acceptance of a plantbased product, free of warning labels and considered a source of protein. It was conducted in the town of Libertador San Martín, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina, in August 2024. The sample consisted of 329 individuals, selected through non-probabilistic sampling. Each participant tasted the product and then completed a five-point hedonic scale. Results. The plant-based product was high in protein and showed a Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score of 0.94, indicating that it provided all essential amino acids. 97.26% of participants expressed interest in consuming it, and the overall acceptance rate was 95.74% (n=315), with positive responses such as “I really like it” and “I like it.” Flavor was the highest-rated attribute, with a 93.2% acceptance (n=309), followed by texture at 89.05% (n=293), and color at 80.25% (n=264). Conclusion. The high-protein product achieved a high level of acceptance, mainly due to its flavor, texture, color, and the absence of warning labels.
Downloads
References
Alcorta A, Porta A, Tárrega A, Alvarez MD, Vaquero MP. Foods for plant-based diets: Challenges and innovations. Foods [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];10(2):293. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/2/293
Aiking H, De Boer J. The next protein transition. Trends Food Sci Technol [Internet]. 2020 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];105:515-522. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7127173/.
Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet [Internet]. 2019 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];393(10184):1958-1972. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899507/.
Unión Vegetariana Argentina. Población vegana y vegetariana 2020 [Internet]. Unión Ve gana; 2020 [citado el 8 de mayo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.unionvegana.org/ poblacion-vegana-y-vegetariana-2020/.
Cramer H, Kessler CS, Sundberg T, Leach MJ, Schumann D, Adams J, et al. Characteristics of Americans choosing vegetarian and vegan diets for health reasons. J. Nutr Educ Behav [Internet]. 2017 [citado el 11 de mayo de 2024];49(7):561-567.e1. Disponible en: https://www.jneb.org/article/S1499-4046(17)30230-0/fulltext
Britos S, Albornoz M. ¿Cómo comen los argentinos? Consumos, brechas y calidad de dieta. Diae ta [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 15 de mayo de 2024] ;40(177):90-105. Disponible en: http://www. scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1852-73372022000100090&lng=es
Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Guías alimentarias para la población Argentina [Internet]. Bue nos Aires: Presidencia de la Nación; 2016 [citado el 4 de abril de 2024], 31-90. Disponible en: https://cesni-biblioteca.org/archivos/nosal.pdf
Ministerio de Salud. Código Alimentario Argentino [Internet]. 2019 [citado el 5 de junio de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/anmat_capitulo_v_ro tulacion_14-01-2019.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Proteins [Internet]. 2024 [citado el 6 de mayo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/nutrition/requirements/proteins/en/.
Hertzler SR, Lieblein-Boff JC, Weiler M, Allgeier C. Plant proteins: Assessing their nutritional quality and effects on health and physical function. Nutr [Internet]. 2020 [citado el 14 de abril de 2024];12(12):3704. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/12/3704
Surya Ulhas R, Ravindran R, Malaviya A, Priyadarshini A, Tiwari BK, Rajauria G. A re view of alternative proteins for vegan diets: Sources, physico-chemical properties, nutritional equivalency, and consumer acceptance. Food Res Int [Internet]. 2023 [citado el 15 de mayo de 2024];173:113479. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S096399692301027X?via%3Dihub
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ed. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013 [citado el 5 de junio de 2024], 66. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/ag/humannutrition/35978-02317b979a686a57aa4593304ffc17f06.pdf
Fiorentini M, Kinchla AJ, Nolden AA. Role of sensory evaluation in consumer acceptance of plant-based meat analogs and meat extenders: A scoping review. Foods [Internet]. 2020 [citado el 11 de abril de 2024];9(9):1334. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/9/1334
World Health Organization. New WHO factsheet: How can we tell if plant-based products are healthy? [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 5 de mayo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/europe/ news/item/22-12-2021-new-who-factsheet-how-can-we-tell-if-plant-based-products-are-healthy
Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Ley de etiquetado frontal: promoción de la alimentación saludable [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 5 de mayo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www. argentina.gob.ar/justicia/derechofacil/leysimple/salud/ley-de-etiquetado-frontal
Schaafsma G. The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score. J Nutr. 2000;130(7):1865S-1867S.
Guerrero Wyss L, Durán-Agüero S. Consumo de legumbres y su relación con enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles. Rev Chil Nutr [Internet]. 2020 [citado el 7 de mayo de 2024];47(5):865-869. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-75182020000500865&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Michel F, Hartmann C, Siegrist M. Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives. Food Qual Prefer [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];87:104063. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343766697_Con sumers’_associations_perceptions_and_acceptance_of_meat_and_plant-based_meat_alternati ves
Ettinger L, Falkeisen A, Knowles S, Gorman M, Barker S, Moss R, et al. Consumer perception and acceptability of plant-based alternatives to chicken. Foods [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 28 de abril de 2024];11(15):2271. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/15/2271
Zeng G, Chen Z, Zhong S. “We Chinese just want meat!”: An analysis of Chinese netizens’ reac tions to vegetarian advocacy. Food Qual Prefer. 2024;115:105128.
Ramírez-Navas JS. Análisis sensorial: pruebas orientadas al consumidor. Revista ReCiTeIA [Inter net]. 2012 [citado el 5 de abril de 2024];12(1):83-102. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate. net/profile/Juan-Ramirez-Navas/publication/257890512_Analisis_sensorial_pruebas_orien tadas_al_consumidor/links/00b495260e24536e05000000/Analisis-sensorial-pruebas-orienta das-al-consumidor.pdf
Szenderák J, Fróna D, Rákos M. Consumer acceptance of plant-based meat substitutes: A narrative review. Foods [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];11(9):1274. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/9/1274
Pointke M, Ohlau M, Risius A, Pawelzik E. Plant-based only: Investigating consumers’ sensory perception, motivation, and knowledge of different plant-based alternative products on the mar ket. Foods [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];11(15):2339. Disponible en: https:// www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/15/2339
Hu FB, Otis BO, McCarthy G. Can plant-based meat alternatives be part of a healthy and sustainable diet? JAMA. 2019;322(16):1547.
Vural Y, Ferriday D, Rogers PJ. Consumers’ attitudes towards alternatives to conventional meat products: Expectations about taste and satisfaction, and the role of disgust. Appetite [Internet]. 2023 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];181:106394. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0195666322004858?via%3Dihub
Hidayat K, Chen JS, Wang HP, Wang TC, Liu YJ, Zhang XY, et al. Is replacing red meat with other protein sources associated with lower risks of coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality? A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutr Rev [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];80(9):1959-1973. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article/80/9/1959/6563767
Fadnes LT, Økland JM, Haaland ØA, Johansson KA. Estimating impact of food choices on life ex pectancy: A modeling study. Fontana L, editor. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 14 de abril de 2024];19(2):e1003889. Disponible en: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003889
Tyndall SM, Maloney GR, Cole MB, Hazell NG, Augustin MA. Critical food and nutrition science challenges for plant-based meat alternative products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr [Internet]. 2024 [citado el 10 de abril de 2024];64(3):638-653. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2022.2107994
Ministerio de Economía Argentino. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. Tendencias de consumo y nuevos desarrollos en alimentos. Alimentos Argentinos [Internet]. 2023 [citado el 6 de mayo de 2024];82:61-62. Disponible en: https://alimentosargentinos.magyp.gob.ar/HomeAlimentos/difusion-y-publicaciones/Revistas/AA_82.pdf
Markets and Markets. Meat substitutes market size, share, trends and growth report [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 5 de abril de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Mar ket-Reports/meat-substitutes-market-979.html
Hernández Sampieri R, Fernandez-Collado CF. Metodología de la investigación. 6.ª ed. Baptista Lucio P, editor. México DF: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
Peryam DR, Pilgrim FJ. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technol [Internet]. 1957 [citado el 4 de mayo de 2024];11:9-14. Disponible en: https://psycnet.apa.org/ record/1959-02766-001
Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA). Food Data Central [Internet]. 2024 [citado el 5 de mayo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Informe sobre la digestibilidad de los ingredientes [Internet]. 2002 [citado el 4 de abril de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/fishery/affris/base-de-datos-sobre-el-recursos-de-la-alimentacion/ informe-sobre-la-digestibilidad-de-los-ingredientes/es/.
Gilani S, Uay R. Evaluación de la calidad de las proteínas de la dieta en nutrición humana [Inter net]. FAO y FINUT; 2017 [citado el 4 de abril de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.finut.org/ wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Estudio-FAO-92-y-documentos-adicionales-al-23112017-1.pdf
Pointke M, Pawelzik E. Plant-based alternative products: Are they healthy alternatives? Micro- and macronutrients and nutritional scoring. Nutr [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 1 de octubre de 2024];14(3):601. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/3/601
Kyriakopoulou K, Keppler JK, Van Der Goot AJ, Boom RM. Alternatives to meat and dairy. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 20 de septiembre de 2024];12(1):29-50. Disponible en: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-food-062520-101850
Godschalk-Broers L, Sala G, Scholten E. Meat analogues: Relating structure to texture and sen sory perception. Foods [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 30 de septiembre de 2024];11(15):2227. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/15/2227
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Investigación Universitaria en Salud

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


